Wednesday, October 31, 2007

Relocation issues -NZ houses

Another aspect of homes that fascinated me during a couple of years of involvement with an relocation company is process of choosing a new home/ house for the incoming transferee.
The company I worked for specialised in settling foreign professionals (mostly executive level ) and their families to Auckland, and I was constantly intrigued by the issues these families faced in choosing and settling into their (short-medium term ) rental accomodation.

Concerns about not only areas to live in but the specifics of the NZ housing style, construction, interior layout and design were common queries as we looked at potential properties together.
Mostly northern hemisphere transferees, they frequently expressed horror at not only the poor quality rental properties on the market, but the high prices being asked for them (even taking into account executive budgets anywhere from $500 to $1000 + p/wk).

Most of them also came from being homeowners themselves and were facing a rental situation for perhaps the first time in a decade or more (if ever!). They often seemed surprised unprepared for the reality of parting with their money to go into a 'compromise' sitiuation- a less than mortgaged ideal.
An English family likened the separate little houses crammed and dotted amidst the tree-lined valleys in the East coast bays to 'shanty towns'.... although aware of the hugely inverse quality of the expensive housing there, this visual impression was not one to inspire comfort.
A Thai couple stopped mid-tour in Mission Bay and declared themselves to have arrived in 'paradise' with its beach and shops, relaxed park/ holiday atmosphere and spread out housing (compared to their years of apartment living in Bangkok). And could they please rent a place there immediately?!

So much of a transferee's expectations in coming to NZ revolve around ensuring a better lifestyle than what they had at home. Partially the is the unstated but understood compensation for making such a major, yet 'temporary' move (often an imposed, unwilling relocation for family members).
Where the executive transferee has already adopted a self-imposed positive approach to all things new and uncomfortable, as they were the ones who invited, or accepted the offer to relocate. If the family were unwillingly moved from their homes...their resistance can make the choosing of a new home particularly fraught!

House interiors bring myriad problems coupled with disbelief (!)for all but the most hardy souls, as they face their first winter in a typical unheated, unlined, uninsulated NZ weatherboard house with wooden floors and leaky, single-glazed windows.

Then there are the hopelessly high electricity bills for the old-fashioned heaters which they can't bear NOT to have going most of the time, not to mention the ;
...no-nonsense brisk responses of 'just put another jersey on' from uncomplaining NZ neighbours and workmates;
...blase dismissals of the need for double-glazing "in this climate", where they are also expected to keep the windows open in the day to ventilate their increasingly dampening house (due to the heaters being on 24/7....);
...and anyway double glazing would cost an arm and a leg and is consdiered a luxury;
...and gas heaters are even more rare and highly priced.

They're feeling colder than they ever felt at home in a snow-covered northern winter...!
And they hadn't expected a house that created physical discomfort and this was often a discouraging start to the long and emotional process of setting up 'home' in another country.

2 comments:

enactivist said...

this brought back many memories for me of arriving in NZ ten years ago, where the 'house' was a major priority. Coming from South Africa (not transferred though - which might lend a different slant?) where most whites would have had extremely comfortable houses, it was difficult to adjust to the typical NZ house, with all the issues and peculiarities you have so accurately described!

From a theory/research angle though, your post got me thinking about how our conceptions of a 'house' are very culture-bound - ie. we project our values into space and architecture. A friend of mine who emigrated at the same time constantly referred to the suburbs of the North Shore as 'one big caravan park' - perhaps plagiarising Paul Theroux, (1992) The Happy Isles of Oceania: Paddling in the Pacific. London: Penguin Books (who is very uncomplimentary about the 'bungaloid' architecture of Auckland and other New World cities (see here for another ref).

But another thought occured - that if Judith Butler is right and gender is performative, then identity and conceptions of architecture might be performative as well ... did you notice any differences between men and women transferees' perceptions of the NZ house?

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.